Tweaks
Building for Tweakability
Virtually every hole in the board is on 0.100" spacing relative to all
the related holes. Also, each resistor's holes are 0.300" apart. This
means you can use socket strips and header pin strips in the board. If
you did this for everything where it makes sense, you would in effect
have a PPA breadboard for maximum tweakability. :) There are
fewer places to do this in PPAv2 than there was in the previous version,
but the parts most likely to be tweaked are still tweakable. You should
at least think about adding connectors or sockets in these places:
- Feedback loop resistors — Use SIP socket strips
to allow easy swapping of resistors. The most common change to a
PPA's components after the fact is to change the gain. If you're
not sure up front what gain you want, adding sockets here is a
good idea.
- Power input — V+, B+ and V- are set up to
allow you to put a Molex KK style connector on the board in
one of two positions. This would let you disconnect the power
jack from the board, or the battery board from the PPA board,
depending on how you have the power flow set up.
- Power switch — I'm not sure what connector would
fit here, but probably something could be worked out. A 2-pin
Molex KK can be made to work for just one of S1+ or S1-, but a
small foursquare connector would work better, if you can find one.
- Signal input — Like with the power input,
you could put a Molex KK connector here. There's more space
here, so almost any connector with 100 mil pin spacing would
work here, actually. Between this and the previous tweaks, you
could completely separate the amp board from the rear panel,
without desoldering anything.
Tweaking the Buffer Bias Point
(Nothing here yet. Patience.)
Biasing the Op-Amps into Class A
"Class A" refers to configuring an amplifier so that its
output devices remain turned on all the time. This reduces thermal
variation and eliminates crossover distortion, which makes the amp
sound better. You can bias the op-amps in the PPA by adding the
cascode JFETs and the source
resistor.
Before I get into the PPA-specific details, you should read my article
Biasing Op-Amps into Class A. Q1 and Q2 in the article are the same as Q1
and Q2 in the PPA, and Rs corresponds to R9
in the PPA.
To set the bias point once the parts are installed, you simply power
the amp up and measure the voltage drop across R10. If R10 is 1 KΩ,
then each volt of drop across R10 equals one milliamp through the cascode,
so it's easy to trim R9 to get a particular op-amp bias current. 1mA
is a good starting value, but you should try other values to see if you
can hear an improvment in the sound at different bias levels.
Adding Crossfeed
There are three holes near the rear edge of the circuit board. These
are for mounting version 1.1 or 1.2 of my modified
Linkwitz crossfeed PCBs on the board. You only use two of the holes,
the middle one and one outside one, depending on where you want the
PCB to be positioned over the amp board. See the previous link for more
information.
Adding Bass-Boost
In cooperation with the op-amp, C7 and a parallel
resistance* in the PPA form a type of "shelving filter",
raising the output level of low frequencies: in other words, it
boosts the bass. The advantage of this type of filter over other
circuits is that it is completely bypassable and it works in
conjunction with the op-amp circuit which had to be there anyway
so it only adds two components.
* The "parallel resistance" is either R7
or the bass boost adjustment pot. Which one you use is a personal
choice. Just think of the pot as an adjustable alternative to R7.
There's no good reason to use both R7 and the pot at the same time.
For clarity, I will just say "R7" from here on.
R7 raises the level of the highest bass boost:
C7 changes the point where the bass boost begins:
The larger the value of C7, the lower the frequency where boosting
starts.
Notice how finely spaced the lines are on the graph. This is a
log-log scale graph, though, so in reality the jumps in corner frequency
between two close capacitor values get larger as the capacitor gets
larger. Therefore, if you want the bass boost to extend clear up into
the low midrange, you must use a line of capacitors with fine-grained
steps between values or else suffer from large jumps in the point where
the boosting begins. The Panasonic ECQP line will work well here, for
instance; they go up to 0.12 µF without requiring lead bending.
If you want to choose a different type, you should use caps with
polypropylene film-and-foil construction for best sound quality. Metalized
polypropylene will also be fine, but I'd only do it if I wanted a really
low amount of boost, and so needed a high value for C7.
The value of R4 also has a small effect on the behavior of the bass
boost circuit:
I include this graph only to show that you can vary R4 without worrying
about what it will do to the bass boost behavior.
It's important to realize that this circuit doesn't roll off at DC,
so any DC offset on your amp's output will also be boosted when you
engage the bass boost. It is important that you minimize DC offsets in
the amp before adding bass-boost. A 20 dB boost (10×) can transform
a harmless 10mV DC offset into a headphone-frying 100mV offset!
If you want to explore these issues in more detail before you
turn on the soldering iron, I suggest you download a copy of the
Micro-Cap 8 demo. Here is a circuit file for you to start
with. (This is the circuit file I used when generating the above graphs,
so it should be set up properly already.)
You can get some of the information you would get from the simulator
without as much work by using the bass boost
calculators.
If you're curious as to how this circuit works, look at R7 and C7 as
two separate paths through the feedback loop. C7's impedance ranges from
infinite at DC down to 0 Ω at high frequencies. Since 0 Ω in
parallel with R7 is 0 Ω, at high frequencies the amp gain follows
the standard formula, given as [1] below. (Yes, the gain formula is
different in the Jung multiloop configuration, but this approximation
suffices for our purposes here.) At low frequencies, C7's impedance is
very high, so R7's resistance dominates the total impedance; it simply
adds to R4's resistance, giving formula [2]. Between these two levels
where the impedance of C7 is near R7's resistance, you have the slope you
see in the graphs above. Formula [3] is derived from these two, telling
you the amount of bass boost relative to the amp's normal gain.
(R4 / R3) + 1 [1]
((R4 + R7) / R3) + 1 [2]
(R7 / (R3 + R4)) + 1 [3]
Tweaking the Isolation JFETs
The standard Q3 configuration works well, but there's
some room for tweaking here.
As I mentioned elsewhere, you can get up to about 30dB of isolation
without really thinking about it. You can get better isolation by picking
your Q3s such that the current draw of the circuitry "below" them is a
high percentage of their IDSS. Because the IDSS of JFETs varies so
wildly, you must measure your JFETs' IDSSes and use similar JFETs in all
of the positions to get the best performance.
There are two consequences of doing this tweak. One, it makes rolling
op-amps more difficult: you may have to change the Q3s at the same
time to make the new op-amp work. Two, the voltage drop across a JFET
increases the closer you get to its IDSS. This could be a problem for
you if it drops too much voltage for your application, or it could be a
way for you to use low-voltage op-amps while still using a high supply
voltage for the buffers.
You may have noticed that you can jumper across all of the Q3 positions
to get a single set of power rails for everything. It's my opinion that if
you're trying so hard to save money that the cost of a few JFETs matters,
you would probably be better off building an amp with an inherently less
expensive design like the PIMETA.
This space intentionally left
blank. :)
|